Dear Mr. Rizzo
We are grateful to you for the suggestion about merits of using "wrong"
opinion.
Since you too seem to be grateful "for setting you straight", allow
us to try once
more. We have never written that "your opinion was wrong". Instead
we wrote, that
"your interpretations of the target and the aim of concert goers are
both wrong in
our opinion". In any case your remarks are welcome since we don't mind
repeating
the grammar lectures given that English is not our first language.
More importantly, is our ire towards NATO misguided? Are the concert
goers
misguided too? Given the extent of NATO and Serbian propaganda one
cannot blame
entirely the concert goers, or indeed your compatriots for that matter,
if they
are misguided . As far as we are concerned, directing our ire towards
Mr.
Milosevic, as you suggest, would certainly seem to be strengthening
NATO case and
justify its actions. If, God forbid, Mr. Milosevic decided to ignite
a civil war
in Montenegro your case would seem to be even more rock solid.
However, the Balkan politics is likely to be more complex than great
majority of
your compatriots may contemplate. It is rarely what is seems to be.
We hope you don't
mind us asking you a few questions and give you an opportunity to enlighten
us.
Are you sure that your administration would want Mr. Milosevic toppled
now as
media may suggest? Can you assure us that Mr. Milosevic hasn't forged
a deal with
your administration to rearrange the ethnic composition of Kosovo and
perhaps
wider area? Can you also assure us that the current NATO bombing doesn't
represent
a kind of diplomatic cover for the possible deal over Kosovo and 'near
abroad'?
How would you describe your compatriots and yours country's foreign
policy that led
Albanians to welcome bombing of Yugoslavia, if anything above asked
has
foundations?
In several years time, when Mr. Holbrooke or Milosevic write their memoirs,
our
present conversation may look very naive. Not to mention after 30 years
when
documents will be declassified, if we are still around though. Yet,
since the
victors write a history, the course of events may justify your theories,
albeit to
the extent. That is, US may preserve the credibility of NATO and also
insure
relatively stable Europe. That nonetheless, begs a question: at what
price? We
suspect, but hope to be wrong, that all the people in the region will
pay a very
heavy price for decades to come. That is tantamount to say "we are
all target".
In regards the "thought for us" about "throughing", we suspect that
both the Serbs
and Albanians have over-elaborated these thoughts and we are seeing
the results
now. They both always wanted to get rid of each other. We are nevertheless
grateful to your reminder "to read a bit of history" and hope that
Montenegrins
will indeed be wise to draw lessons from their own history and not
to repeat
mistakes of the past. Lessons from history books are immensely useful
for the
people of the country which strives to defend itself, as you have rightly
suggested. That may not be bad text either for the people in the country
that
favors bombing the others into submission, may we add?
Kind Regards