|
 After
the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe the first steps towards the
restoration of the MOC were undertaken. The people of the village Bajice
near Capital Cetinje petitioned a demand to the religious and civil authorities
of the Republic for the return of the name to the Cetinje monastery and
the restoration of the MOC. This action prompted a hot ‘scientific’ and
‘quasi scientific’ debate between followers and sympathizers of the Serbian
Orthodox Church (SOC) and those of the MOC.
 The
opponents of the restoration of the MOC saw and qualified
those Montenegrins who favored the restoration of the MOC as "heresy" (jeres)
or "tribal religion" (plemenska religija). They argued that 'Montenegrins
and Serbs are the ‘same nation’ and of the ‘same religion’, and therefore,
should have only one church (the SOC). Re-establishing the MOC would weaken
the SOC and undermine traditional unity between Montenegrins and Serbs
and therefore be at the expense of both'.
The sympathizers of the MOC stressed that they did not demand any
alteration of orthodox learning or orthodox dogma. Accordingly, they claimed
that they were merely asking for proclamation of the MOC  ‘according
to national and state principle characteristic for the Christian orthodoxy’.
They also insisted on their historical right to the property confiscated
by the SOC (650 churches and monasteries), as well as to be able to choose
themselves a Metropolitan of their own ethnicity, and to be able to baptize
their children as Montenegrins of the Christian Orthodox faith. It was
noted that, regrettably, since the abolishment of the MOC (1920), Montenegrins
could not exercise these rights in the Serbian Orthodox Church, because
the SOC did not recognize the Montenegrin nation and consequently could
not issue the baptismal certificate to those who wanted to be baptized
as Montenegrins. Therefore, the restoration of the MOC has become more
than the question of wounded national pride and dignity for many Montenegrins.
 As
noted before, the feelings of the supporters of the MOC gained momentum
with the collapse of communism and with the collapse and separation of
former Yugoslavia. Following the centuries-old tradition of popular election
of the Montenegrin Metropolitans, on October 31, in capital Cetinje, ‘the
General Montenegrin People's Assembly’ elected their own Metropolitan,
His Holiness Antonije Abramovic. For many Montenegrins the election of
the new spiritual leader signified the renovation of Montenegrin Autocephalous
Orthodox Church. However, Vladika's counterpart from the SOC, His Holiness
Risto Radovic, who also calls himself Metropolitan of Montenegro and the
Coast (disputes that he is a Metropolitan of SOC) denied legality of the
new Metropolitan claiming that "the proclamation of the MOC and election
of the new Metropolitan is not a religious but a political act". In addition
His Holiness Risto Radovic, dismissed any possibility of returning the
property of the MOC.
 Refusal
of the SOC to return the property to the MOC forced the clergy of the MOC
to hold religious ceremonies under the open sky following an old Christian
tradition. Even though, according to independent media reports, the MOC
has been immensely more popular in Cetinje than the SOC, it has no support
of the two main political forces in Montenegro. Leaders of the governing
party in Montenegro, Democratic Party of Socialists (DPS), use to
claim that, ‘since the church and the state are separate, the Government
has nothing to do with the church’. Nevertheless,
after the split in the DPS, its legal successor DPS CG, and thus the Government
of Montenegro, declared (15.03.1998) that it only supports "materially
and politically the orthodox metropoly established 800 years ago (thus
SOC), which is being led by (mitropolit crnogorsko-primorski, zetsko-brdski
i skenderijski i egzarh peckog trona) Mr Amfilohije".
The Republic's strongest opposition party (excluding Bulatovic's fraction
of DPS which supports SPC by default), People Party (Narodna Stranka),
openly supports the SOC and opposes the MOC. On the other hand
the supporters of MOC are reported to be Liberal Alliance of Montenegro
and Social Democratic Party of Montenegro.
Nevertheless, in January 2000, the civil authorities decided to
allowed the MOC to add its name to the register of religious institution.
In the further emancipation of the People Party, its leader, Dr. Novak
Kilibarda, acknowledged that the MOC indeed was autocephalous during the
reign of prices (vladike) and that "Montenegrin Constitution,
states that clearly". Dr. Kilibarda further wandered why Mr. Radovic keeps
denying to be a Metropolitan of the Serbian Orthodox Metropoly in Montenegro
(MontenaFax 31.01.2000).
 During
his reign, His Holiness Antonije Bishop of Cetinje and Metropolitan of
Montenegro was subjected to an orchestrated campaign of intrigues and smear.
His Holiness Antonije answered by preaching peace and love and praying
for all including ‘the sinners who tried to undermine authority of the
MOC by attacks on his own personality’.
Following the death of His Holiness Antonije, it is reported that
the General Montenegrin people's assembly chose Mr Miras Dedeic to be the
new head of the MOC.
 On
14.03.1998. according to media reports, the Montenegrin Orthodox Church
got a successor of the throne of Montenegrin metropolitans(daily "Pobjeda"
15.03.98). In the cathedral of Saint Paraskeva in Sofia, archimandrite
Mihailo (Miras Dedeic) was ordained into a bishop (episkop). The
ordination took place after the decision taken by the Saint Synod of the
Bulgarian Orthodox Church, and was conducted by the Patriarch Pimen assisted
by seven bishops and four priests. Ordination into a metropolitan is expected
to take place in Cetinje in the following months ( daily "Pobjeda" 15.03.98).
|